We would love to hear your suggestions and feedback, or if you are press looking for a media contact, please don't hesitate to use the contact form below. We aim to respond within a couple of hours. 

Showing 51 reactions

  • Shane Godfrey
    commented 2018-07-11 21:01:29 +0100
    Lawnmowers are loud to drown out the screams of the grass
  • Jon Hill
    commented 2018-06-24 19:21:48 +0100
    I don’t see a lot of posts on this site. The latest is the one on clinical trials from several weeks ago. Were you on the March yesterday? Science will suffer from Brexit and we need to lobby to stay in as many european organisations as possible. What do MRC NERC etc say?
  • Ian Loader
    commented 2018-06-24 17:32:56 +0100

    I have a suggestion that I believe would induce another national referendum on Brexit, in fact I think it’s the only way that it might happen.

    I also have a workable, practical and as yet unexploieed way to raise a substantial amount of public money for the NHS.

    So I would be very grateful if you could point me in the right direction as who to contact that might give it some effective consideration.

    Best regards,

    Ian Loader
  • ggz barson
    commented 2018-06-23 19:38:38 +0100
    hopeful you are truly concerned scientists, mature enough to have exchanged ego for world good:

    has the most advanced and simple technology in history. Please help nurture it thru EU patent and introducing the new paradigm
  • tony martin
    commented 2018-06-14 12:58:42 +0100
    East Lothian 4 Europe and all the other anti Brexit groups in Scotland are very clear in wanting the Peoples Vote options to be agreed on asap. We fear one or two individuals or the government may dictate what is on the ballot paper. Our position is that we want the option of Remaining in the EU to be on the paper and we urge you along with other groups in PV campaign to make sure this is included. We notice Mr Campbell is an advisor to PV and we hope he does not dictate as to the wording . He has often been wrong in the past and in also recent times. We in the Scotland campaign need this option on the menu of options. Thank you
  • Isabelle Goodman
    commented 2018-05-18 14:08:42 +0100
    To whom it may concern,

    I am a final year student at Brighton University, studying 3D Design and Craft.

    I have spent this year creating designs based on the anxieties that the public have been facing regarding the NHS, Brexit and Southern Rail strikes – all areas that I think may be of interest to you!

    Our final year show runs from June 1st (private showing) to June 10th and includes my work based on these common anxieties (including the “Return to Europe armbands”, I cannot attach picture here, please see on my instagram img__design).

    I would like to extend a personal invitation to the show to you – and if you can attend, I would be delighted to show you around.

    Please email me if you are interested in attending or would like to know more.

    Best wishes,

    Izzy Goodman
  • Chris James
    commented 2018-05-14 16:54:54 +0100
    Why do you insist on a phone number in order to donate? You will receive nothing from me while this is the case.
  • Istqlal Usman
    commented 2018-05-04 23:13:40 +0100
    Hello Everyone, Im Istqlal Usman, A teenage guy from somewhere on Earth. From almost past 4 years I am thinking about this planet Earth and the life of everyone living thing here. I’ve found many deep hidden secrets here and I wish to share it with this World. Because we only live once and I don’t want to miss this chance. So what am I suppose to do now? Would you help me out in this? I’ve founded even the way of getting rid of Cancer trust me everyone. Contact me and Ill tell you everything every little secrets of Life and Earth. I do have even the power in my words to make someones Blood Pressure. I even do have the power to let one country rule the other one whoever they want Believe me. Contact me ASAP!
  • Istqlal Usman
    commented 2018-05-04 23:12:30 +0100
    Hello Everyone, Im Istqlal Usman, A teenage guy from somewhere on Earth. From almost past 4 years I am thinking about this planet Earth and the life of everyone living thing here. I’ve found many deep hidden secrets here and I wish to share it with this World. Because we only live once and I don’t want to miss this chance. So what am I suppose to do now? Would you help me out in this? I’ve founded even the way of getting rid of Cancer trust me everyone. Contact me and Ill tell you everything every little secrets of Life and Earth. I do have even the power in my words to make someones Blood Pressure. I even do have the power to let one country rule the other one whoever they want Believe me. Contact me ASAP!
  • Colin Gordon
    commented 2018-04-26 13:08:26 +0100
    Need to talk asap please about BBC interview in Oxford midday tomorrow.
  • Francisco Ángel Poyatos
    commented 2018-04-25 18:11:27 +0100
    Hi there

    My name is Francisco Ángel Poyatos

    I´m working on a final degree project that includes a reportage about the pro-European voices in the UK.

    By May I´ll be in the United Kingdom to contact the sources and Scientists for EU is one of them.

    I want to verify before may the sources availability. In order to do that, may I ask you: Is there a physical location, in London, where I can come up? Would you, once there, facilitate me, face to face, some information or interviews? In that case, I´ll be glad to write you again afterwards. Thank you in advance.
  • Venetia Caine
    commented 2018-04-22 15:27:53 +0100
    Here are two direct and irritating consequences to me, a 72-year-old pensioner, should we leave the EU. They will not be delayed by any transitional period.

    1. The French car hire firm I’m using next month will insist I have an international driving licence.

    2. I shall have to travel to my nearest French consulate once a year for them to verify my existence for each of the four retirement pensions I receive from when I worked in France. At present my local authority is acceptable for the purpose.

    There must be dozens more ‘petty’ inconveniences which will affect individuals. Collect and publicise them and soft Brexiters will soon change their minds.
  • Stephan Petermann
    commented 2018-04-18 14:35:47 +0100
    Dear Dr. Galsworthy, Dr Rob Davidson, I am contacting you from the thinktank of the architecture office OMA founded by architect Rem Koolhaas. We are currently organizing a call for creatives for campaigns for the next European elections. For this we are reaching out to other fields to gather support. I would like to get in touch with you, either by email or phone to hopefully connect to your great work. Thanks for your attention, Stephan Petermann
  • Ettore Pedretti
    commented 2018-04-11 09:02:19 +0100
    I am e European scientist. I am presently at the AIP in Potsdam (DE) but travel regularly to see my family in Edinburgh. As a scientist I share your concern about Europe. I see that the problem is not only in the UK. BRexit has embolded right-wing parties in the whole EU. If we do not act now there may not be a Europe left for us. There are several pro european groups promoting Europe and there is lots of fragmentation. Perhaps you could take the lead and grow from a local UK based organisation to EU-wide scientist organisation. There is Pulse of Europe as a european wide organisation Maybe you could join forces with them and make this a pan-european movement, like the Union of the Concerned Scientists is in the US. First thing would be to acquire an additional .eu domain. BTW apologies for the multiple entries but any hit of return sends a message on your message site. Perhaps you could improve on that.
  • Ettore Pedretti
    commented 2018-04-11 08:44:02 +0100
  • Ettore Pedretti
    commented 2018-04-11 08:42:57 +0100
  • Ettore Pedretti
    commented 2018-04-11 08:42:13 +0100

    I am e European scientist. I am presently at the AIP in Potsdam (DE) but travel regularly to see my family in Edinburgh. I share your concern about Europe
  • Colin Gordon
    commented 2018-04-09 14:55:52 +0100
    Mike, please could you come to speak at an event in Oxford on Brexit impacts on Friday April 27th 7.30-9.15pm? bw Colin pp Oxford for Europe
  • Gavin Clarke
    commented 2018-04-04 23:15:05 +0100
    Hi – I’m with Best for Britain – I’m the group’s SW London Facebook administrator. In addition to B4B I’m working with the London Pro-European Network to try and keep Remainers across the region up to date on public events in specific areas that they might otherwise miss. There’s a lot of us individually and in different groups; the hope is to close knowledge gaps on events so we can work more cohesively and develop greater mass, thereby exerting more influence on politicians and the media in what’s going to be a pivotal year for Brexit. A key part of that is adding Remain and pro-EU events to a public calendar, here: Is there somebody I could speak to at Scientists for the EU, who I can liaise with to find out about future events? Thanks in advance!
  • Alice Hovanessian
    commented 2018-03-29 21:23:46 +0100
    Hi Mike, I don’t suppose you can come and speak at our NHS-themed Pulse of Europe on Sun 9 April, 2-4pm? Many thanks, Alice Hovanessian, Bath for Europe.
  • Emma Heseltine
    commented 2018-03-21 18:21:54 +0000
    Dear OFOC, Britain for Europe, Best for Britain, Another Europe is Possible, Scientists for EU, INFacts, Healthier IN the EU, Open Britain, European Movement UK, Border Communities Against Brexit, young activists of Reclaim!, JK Rowling, Doreen Lawrence, David Attenborough, Brian May, Frances O Grady,

    PLEASE consider this idea to gather and grow the pro-EU-membership movement, by together agreeing a social-media-shared Pledge along with a related umbrella website for info and mobilisation.

    ​THANK YOU!!!


    For the first anniversary since Theresa May invoked Article 50, this pledge comes from members of the next generation, ordinary citizens of all ages, public figures, researchers, community activists, human rights and environmental campaigners, and trade unionists:

    The hugely important question the UK is now facing is how much damage we incur before the next generation gets to reverse Brexit and how many problems we create for them. We therefore pledge to do everything we can at this critical time to bring about a democratic change of policy in order to protect our communities, public services, jobs, rights, opportunities, environment and our neighbours.

    This is why we are making this pledge to support a Coalition for Hope to be a highly-visible umbrella campaign, including all who share the aim of achieving a majority mandate to end Brexit and to instead work for social justice, community cohesion and democratic inclusion at all levels of power.


    Name, Constituency, Vol: Email, Organisations/Institutions Affiliated with, Special Areas of Interest

    Why do we need this Pledge?

    We acknowledge that in 2016 the majority of those born in the first half of the 20th century voted for Brexit. However we also acknowledge that the generations born in the last quarter of the 20th century voted by majority to keep the UK’s place in our regional union, and that 3 out 4 UK residents born in the seventies, 5 out 6 of those born in the eighties, and 8 out of 9 of those born in the nineties never voted for this divisive policy[i]. So if the UK opts to go ahead with it now, the national divisions would only deepen every year as another half million of the next generation come of age and another quarter of a million Leave voters pass away.

    If we go ahead with Brexit and its consequences, we believe there would be growing unrest in the communities, regions and generations most let down by Brexit, a backlash against the main political parties, and increased scapegoating by the people responsible for Brexit. We do not believe that those who voted for Brexit could be satisfied, as Brexit would not magically turn the UK back in time to the era of British industry, imperial power, monoculturalism, plentiful fish stocks and affordable housing. Instead the predicted loss of national income (between 5 and 20 times the 0.4% of national income we currently spend as a net EU contribution) would mean major cuts to public services[ii].

    Nor do we believe as Boris Johnson claimed that Brexit would, “end this sterile debate [as] we would have to recognise that most of our problems are not caused by “Bwussels”[iii]. Instead we believe that Brexit would further increase the national rift over the UK’s place in Europe and create economic paralysis, as the Brexiteers’ vision of a low-regulation, low-tax economy hits stalemate against citizens fighting to keep protections of workers, consumers, our welfare state and our environment. However, we do agree with Johnson that Brexit would involve, “embroiling the Government for several years in a fiddly process of negotiating new arrangements, so diverting energy from the real problems of this country – low skills, low social mobility, low investment etc – that have nothing to do with Europe”[iv] Worst of all, we believe that if we go ahead with Brexit we would find that enacting the much stronger future mandate to rejoin the EU would be an even harder and longer process than enacting the weak[v] 2016 mandate to leave, and it would not immediately bring back the lost industries, lost jobs or the lost funding for the public purse.

    Ultimately, we believe the only winners from going ahead with Brexit would be those who want to sow disunity and weakness in our country, a few very wealthy investors, and those who feel freer having their regulations dictated behind closed doors by US business interests rather than having them voted on by a democratically-elected parliament, following the EU principles of Human Dignity, Equality, Human Rights, Freedom, Democracy and the Rule of Law. In 2018 our country must therefore make the choice whether to dig ourselves deeper into this mess or else to climb back out of the hole and turn to tackle our real problems.

    However we voted or didn’t vote in 2016, we now have to ask ourselves if we really want to spend our own and others’ resources on Brexit instead of meeting other needs and if we are really willing to see growing division in our country. Otherwise, we could decide to take the chance to renew our membership now before the worst harm is done and before all goodwill is destroyed. Then the national chasm created by Brexit would naturally heal over time as the generations move on and the pro-membership majority grows, and the resources that would have been lost to Brexit could instead go towards solutions to heal the UK’s divisions and injustices. There are millions of ordinary people across the UK who very much wish we would do just that, and who feel very deeply that Brexit is the wrong policy. However, most are not actively campaigning because they can’t see what they could effectively do.

    This is why we must call on popular figures to publicly stand up for the next generation and help create a high-profile and inclusive coalition launch that the entire country would hear about. We need people with the voice to call to centre stage the potential groundswell of hope and activism which is currently hidden backstage behind the silence and hopelessness.

    This is why coalition partners need to create an umbrella website for the pro-membership supporter base to sign up to, in order to access and input information about events and activism for both their local constituency (eg activism training, street stalls, MP visits, canvassing, letter or postcard campaigns, creative flash choirs/street theatre/pop-up street exhibitions, community talk-shop events such as “Common Ground” or “Take Back Control” etc., and “Fixit not Brexit” community volunteering), and for their particular interests (eg workers’ rights, youth opportunities, environment etc.), as well as providing access to a searchable resource catalogue combining the materials from all the different groups and others.

    We must also call upon allies in the music industry to awaken even more hope through organising major public Unity concerts this summer across the UK and EU, to give us the chance to express how we feel about Brexit and to send a strong message to the other 27 and the rest of the UK to show how many Brits still want friendship, partnership, and membership of our regional community.

    Regardless of what happens in 2019, such a coalition for hope can help revive the values of inclusion and compassion in our fractured society, and help pave the way for a better future. We know that Cambridge Analytica successfully played on Fear in 2016, exploiting anxiety over terrorism, refugees and powerlessness. Yet Hope is also a powerful driver. Indeed, it is the driver that brought the EU into existence. Hope cannot be harnessed in the legal technicalities of Brexit reversal nor in repeating warnings to a Brexit-weary population. Hope must be harnessed in togetherness and celebration; in community events, concerts, and bringing the generations together. Imagine if councils and mayors were lobbied to take a Values Pledge, and promised to encourage their communities, schools and libraries to commemorate Europe Days (5th and 9th May), and Commonwealth Day (12th March), along with days such as Civilians’ Remembrance Day (22nd June- Karlsruhe anniversary) and UN Day for the Eradication of Poverty (17th October), as occasions to celebrate collective efforts to overcome the sufferings of war, poverty and colonialism, to celebrate international and interfaith cooperation, and to celebrate our connections and the contributions of #GreatBritishMigrants who have migrated to or from the UK.

    Together, as a Coalition for Hope, we could avert social disaster, protect our rights, and restore our place in our regional community. But we could also achieve even more than that: we could help both our country and our continent to return from growing division and intolerance to instead reclaim solidarity, equality, democracy, and hope. This is why we must pledge to do all we can to make this happen.

    (NB see also this related petition:

    A Potential Charter for a Coalition of Hope:

    To work for a UK that:

    1) Pursues solutions rather than scapegoats

    2) promotes unity and solidarity, not division, inequality and intolerance

    3) looks forwards to the future, rather than backwards to old enmities and coercive colonialist power

    4) provides its people with freedom and opportunities, not barriers

    5) keeps the savings of union, rather than creating extra costs and further cuts

    6) ensures access to affordable local housing for all, rather than ensuring access to chlorine-washed chicken but selling-off housing

    7) revives our NHS rather than creating a staffing crisis and offering our healthcare to private companies in trade deals

    8) renews our welfare state and provides dignity for all, rather than turning the UK into a low-welfare tax haven

    9) protects workers, the public and our environment, rather than pushing deregulation or corporate lack of accountability

    10) provides transparency, accountability, and democratic input in all areas, including trade deals

    11) safeguards human rights

    12) is known for its positive influence, not for isolationist insignificance or putting profit before people

    13) enables peace in Ireland, not a return to violence, or economic hardship

    14) has an effective democracy and effective electoral commission, ensuring access to quality fact-checked and all-sided information, preventing press baron and donor privilege, and preventing social media manipulation by hostile agents

    15) gives us all a say over our future, rather than withholding the franchise from those most affected

    16) enjoys the benefits of full EU membership, rather than opting for a poorer deal or a cliff edge catastrophe

    To work for an EU that:

    1) proactively practices democratic inclusion and upholds its principles of Human Dignity, Equality, Human Rights, Freedom, Democracy and the Rule of Law in all its areas of power

    2) is highly accountable to the citizenry and the regions, with strong limits on the influence of any one or handful of state governments

    3) promotes investment in local employment as well as opportunities for work experience or study across the EU for every young resident

    [i] Based on the Ashcroft Referendum Exit Poll and data from ONS and Electoral Commission, which suggest that for UK residents born in the 70s and 80s about 9/10 were enfranchised, and for those born in the 70s about 8/10 of eligible residents were registered to vote of which about 2/3 voted, of which a little under half voted for Brexit, for those born in the 80s about 7/10 of those eligible were registered of which 2/3 voted of which 2/5 voted for Brexit, while for those born in the 90s, 3/4 were enfranchised, of which 2/3 were registered to vote, of which 1/4 voted for Brexit.

    [ii] Based on DExEU predictions of lost national income between 2% and 8% depending on type of Brexit

    [iii] Boris Johnson in the Daily Telegraph 2013

    [iv] Boris Johnson in the Daily Telegraph 2016

    [v] Weak not just in terms of a slim majority of just 1.3 million (for a nation of 65.6 million), but in terms of interpreting the mandate, considering that Dominic Cummings, director of Vote Leave, found that his winning messages were that voting “leave” would achieve £350 million extra a week for the NHS and prevent unlimited immigration from Turkey, whereas the government’s policy response to the vote has been to create an NHS staffing crisis through attacking immigration, to accept loss of resources for the NHS through accepting a 2-8% limiting of national income, and to give up the UK’s veto on Turkey joining the EU.
  • Jeremy Hall
    commented 2018-03-18 13:53:00 +0000
    Does anyone have alternative slogans to “Bollocks to Brexit”? It’s too negative and crude for our older supporters to chant as they march. We need something positive and memorable.
  • Precious Adesina
    commented 2018-03-16 16:16:34 +0000
    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I am a freelance journalist and MA Newspaper Journalism Student at City University. I am currently writing an article on the effects Brexit will have on medical research in the EU and England. I was wondering whether I could interview someone who knows about this topic?

    Thank you for your time.

    Your sincerely,

    Precious Adesina
  • Precious Adesina
    commented 2018-03-16 16:16:33 +0000
    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I am a freelance journalist and MA Newspaper Journalism Student at City University. I am currently writing an article on the effects Brexit will have on medical research in the EU and England. I was wondering whether I could interview someone who knows about this topic?

    Thank you for your time.

    Your sincerely,

    Precious Adesina
  • Keith Beck
    commented 2018-03-14 12:35:19 +0000
    I support everything you are doing to challenge the disaster that is Brexit. It is right that the falsehoods and irrationality should be contradicted with facts and logic. However, I do wonder if pointing out the nonsense and incompetence of the Brexit government will be enough.
    I think it is worth considering why the Tory right are so opposed to the EU. It comes down to the kind of society they believe is desirable and this is based on the fundamental principle of total personal responsibility. They see no reason why they should pay taxes to support other people’s health, welfare, education and livelihood, so the aim is to establish a low-tax, low-welfare, low-regulation UK and the fundamental social democracy of the EU would not allow this to happen.

    So, to achieve their end, the hard Brexiters want to crash out of the EU without a deal and without any residual adherence to EU constraints. The ensuing catastrophe for the UK economy could result in the Government declaring a state of emergency, enabling them to push through radical changes under emergency powers.

    Superficially, the Government must be seen to be trying to achieve a ‘good deal’ for the UK in leaving the EU, but I think it necessary to consider the shadowy figures behind the initiative and the way they control the strings of the Government frontmen. If one were trying to achieve a complete breakdown of negotiations with the EU, whilst all the time seeming to try to achieve a deal, one could do no better than to make sure of the appointment of a known lazy and incompetent, failed leadership bidder as the Minister to head up the negotiations. Then provide him with support from a disgraced and sacked former minister and a known and proven liar, all under the direction of a Prime Minister who totally abandoned her former strong beliefs in order to get the top job. Add to this the media propaganda machine constantly blaming the EU for intransigence and a Parliament cowed by the threat of being seen to be anti-democratic for rejecting the ‘Will of the People’ and it becomes clear what the real target result might be.

    Whilst it is pretty certain that if a second referendum were to be held, the decision would be reversed, you can be sure that agreement to hold one is the last thing the Government and their puppet masters will do. In my view, only Parliament can get us out of this. Moderate MPs must start realising where this is headed and we must do all we can to support those of all parties that are already standing up to be counted. Just what Mr Corbyn is thinking about all this, I have no idea, but it is not helping to achieve his party’s stated objectives for a fairer UK. If I were a conspiracy theorist, I might think that the rather lax membership criteria for the Labour Party a while ago allowed the infiltration of people who wanted to see a known Eurosceptic as leader, but that is another story, or is it?
  • Graham Jones
    commented 2018-03-12 13:38:23 +0000
    Mike et al, Could you e-mail me at please? Need to sort out comments we’ve had re. Euratom and the isotopes issue. Thanks!

    Dr Graham Jones, Chair, Oxfordshire Region branch, European Movement UK
  • Simon Hemmings
    commented 2018-03-11 22:01:52 +0000
    I work in an aerospace company and the customs union is a major issue for us. Do you want details of this?
  • Sebastian Merrick
    commented 2018-03-11 10:32:06 +0000
    Dear Scientists for EU

    I got this silly idea in my head, it won’t go away. So I wanted to share it with some people who are leading the Remain movement, who would know more if it has legs, so to speak. Please knock it about with your team if you think it does.

    Remain are talking about the mood of the country changing for a second referendum. But how is that seen and felt across the country? We have tried big street rallies. But the big London rallies are never big enough. And they take up your whole day. It’s a huge commitment. And they are dismissed because they are in the capital.

    Time is running out. It seems to me that there should indeed be a positive Remain street presence but that it should be decentralised, easy, regular, and positive.

    Ok, so how about every Saturday, 12.00-12.15pm – Conga4EU. Or something. ContinEUity Conga. Conga 2 Remain Longer.

    Wherever you are. It’d take at first maybe 50-100 local groups across the country to organize and coordinate the first, to the minute. Easy to do, just need a ghetto blaster. And someone with a megaphone or loud voice. Remainers passing by can join in. Make it clear it’s 15 minutes only. Then those who want can stop for a coffee, a pint, lunch, or whatever, to socialise. Not all in one place, just encouraging people they can if they want break off for 30 mins afterward to socialise, and spending money in local businesses always does wonders for the message.

    Of course the key is to get the initial media coverage and the idea established. Cities, towns, villages, in the park or your front garden… I guess there is a quiet street presence at the moment but it is generally leafleting actions by local groups, and there is no media story in that. Then make it EVERY Saturday, the same 15 minutes…. and spread it to 200 towns and so on. Watch the congas get longer each week… Or insist on a maximum number. After 20 people, start a new conga in a different direction.

    Fun, non-threatening, localised and country-wide, can be done by anyone, doesn’t take a lot of time, demonstrates unity, creates relationships, not shouty, and in the opposite spirit of the protests threatened by Brexiters if Brexit is cancelled. The central message is that E.U. membership (or at the very least the closest possible relationship) is and has been a positive force in our lives, economically and personally.

    Could be something else than conga but that’s what’s in my head. Whaddayouthink?

    Sebastian Merrick
  • Steve Giles
    commented 2018-03-08 18:37:30 +0000
    …this is the text of a letter I sent to the Guardian last week, re the Brexit/Irish Border issue, which they didn’t publish…

    The current debate about avoiding a hard border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland after the UK leaves the EU has concentrated on Northern Ireland’s membership of a Customs Union. This emphasis is misleading, because it overlooks the far more fundamental issue of the Common Travel area between the UK and the Republic of Ireland. The CTA has been in place since 1922, and the UK and the RI joined the Common Market in 1973 on the same day, precisely to secure the CTA. Membership of a Customs Union is not sufficient to secure the CTA, because the CTA functions as a freedom of movement zone in which all journeys between the UK and the RI (including flights and ferries from the RI to UK mainland – not just between the RI and Northern Ireland) are in practice domestic. At the same time, thanks to the CTA, the Irish Republic international border is effectively the UK’s ‘western’ border with the EU. If the UK is to ‘control its borders’ after Brexit in Brexiteer fashion, in a scenario where the RI remains a member of the EU and European Economic Area, then the UK must have passport controls between itself (including Northern Ireland) and the RI. If there are no passport controls between the RI and Northern Ireland, then there will have to be passport controls between Northern Ireland and mainland UK. All such measures would be incompatible with the Good Friday agreement, and would signal the end of a mutually beneficial arrangement that goes back almost a century. Ultimately, the only solution to the ‘Irish border problem’ is for the UK to be a member of EEA.

    (On the legal complexities of the impact of Brexit on the CTA, see also the House of Commons Briefing Paper 7661, 9 June 2017)

    Emeritus Professor Steve Giles

    Modern Languages

    University of Nottingham
  • Frank Devenney
    commented 2018-03-01 13:03:19 +0000
    Why are we not telling people the truth ,why the three brexiteers want to trade outside EU is to allow them to get the great ideas and designs here take them to China or India amongst others get them made cheap with slave labour and bring back here and sell a massive mark up to make profits for them and their ilk

    This will lead to huge job losses here and the city will go on playing monopoly while we scratch around for crumbs.Time to tell the truth